For council members: the full dossier at hand, every meeting prepared
Why you want this
Council work is a part-time job with a full-time reading load. Every committee meeting comes with hundreds of pages; a dossier's history hides in years of earlier records, and the answer to whether something is even allowed sits with national government or with a court. The BesluitBron gives you, through Claude, one address to all of it: the meeting records of your own municipality and of 330 other bodies, the register of the Tweede Kamer, the official publications from a permit to an act of parliament, and the rulings of the Dutch judiciary. Free, no account, and it is one connector you set up once.
Ask in plain language what is on the next committee agenda, what happened earlier in this dossier, and where records contradict each other. Claude reads the underlying documents and references down to the page, so you can quote in the debate instead of guessing. Every tool carries its source in its name, so each answer shows whether it comes from your own council, from parliament or from a ruling.
For coalition and opposition alike
Coalition: defend policy with the full dossier behind you. See instantly what was promised and decided before, support proposals with what comparable municipalities already did, and avoid a forgotten passage from an old attachment flipping the debate. Whoever knows the dossier best keeps control over delivering the coalition agreement.
Opposition: scrutiny is your core task, and scrutiny needs facts. Test executive promises against what was actually decided, find the contradiction between this year's proposal and last year's attachment, and feed your written questions with page-precise quotes. The information gap with the executive shrinks when the whole archive is one question away.
From practice
1. Meeting preparation in fifteen minutes
"What is on Thursday's spatial-planning committee agenda, and what is the history behind each item?" Claude fetches the agenda with its records and builds the dossier history per item, including what your own group said about it before.
2. Better policy by learning from 330 other bodies
"Which municipalities adopted a housing target-group ordinance and which percentages do they use?" Instead of reinventing the wheel, your amendment starts from what already works elsewhere, decisions attached as evidence. The ordinance as it was officially published sits in the same connector, so you read the adopted text and not only the proposal.
3. From council decision to statute and ruling
"What did the Tweede Kamer decide about this scheme, and has a court ruled on a municipality that arranged it this way?" That is one question across three sources: the register of parliament with the vote per faction, the published scheme, and the rulings on the objections to it. For the question of whether a proposal will hold up, that is the difference between a hunch and an answer.
4. Guarding consistency in long-running dossiers
"Is there daylight between the 2024 swimming-pool business case and today's credit request?" Page-precise fragments from both records side by side make the comparison concrete, for the coalition to explain, for the opposition to question.
5. Finding your own archive back
Motions, amendments and questions from years ago are searchable by topic, including who sat on the council and committees at the time. If a document once stood on the municipal website and has since disappeared, it is often still in the web archive of 2020 and 2021. Institutional memory without the filing cabinet.
Connect Claude before your next meeting
An organisation that would rather run this service inside its own network can do so: the software is licensed under the EUPL-1.2 and the source code is available on request. Run it yourself.
Search right away, no AI
There is also a direct search function, for simple use without an AI assistant: one search screen searches all six sources at once, with every result linking straight to its source.